Ask a first year student to draw a virus and, almost always, they draw a tailed bacteriophage (because that's what biology textbooks show). Ask them to describe virus infection of cells, and they invariably talk about virus particles injecting their genome into the cell "like a syringe". So they know about bacteriophage lambda (which is good), but what else is out there?
A recent short review points out that known archaeal viruses comprise only a few percent of all known prokaryotic viruses (Archaeal viruses and bacteriophages: comparisons and contrasts. (2014) Trends Microbiol. pii: S0966-842X(14)00041-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2014.02.007). Viruses infecting archaea are morphologically diverse and present some unique types not seen in prokaryotic (or eukaryotic) viruses. Archaeal viruses reveal new insights into the virus world, such as deep evolutionary relationships between viruses that infect hosts from all three domains of life.
How does this diversity arise? It has been proposed that the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of cellular life was infected by a number of viruses, and then specific virus groups adapted to infect the evolving cells that deviated to form the current three domains of cellular life. It has also been suggested that bacteria and archaea are infected by such different types of viruses due to the differences in their cell envelope composition. Archaeal viruses represent fossilized time and give us a glimpse back into the very origin of cells.
More suggstions (via Vincent Racaniello):
- Koonin, E.V., Senkevich, T.G., & Dolja, V.V. (2006) The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells. Biol Direct, 1(1), 29.
- Koonin, E. V., & Dolja, V. V. (2013). A virocentric perspective on the evolution of life. Current opinion in virology, 3(5), 546-557.
- TWiV 275: Virocentricity with Eugene Koonin